Cases when the
urbanism documentation is drafted at the exclusive initiative of the
local public authority
As noted above,
according to GEO 7 – which significantly amended the Urbanism Law – the
initiative for drafting the PUZ became an exclusive prerogative of the
local public administration. Therefore, GEO 7/2011 brought more
coherence to the urbanism procedure and stopped the arbitrary changes of
PUZs, previously put in place by the Urbanism Law. According to the
provisions of GEO 7, the amendment of a PUZ could have been requested by
the investor and elaborated at the investor’s expense for big projects
only. Big projects were defined as the construction of industrial parks,
technological parks, hypermarkets, commercial parks, production areas,
residential assemblies, and the extension of the intra muros area
of the locality with at least 10,000 sq. m. for dwelling purposes or
with at least 5,000 sq. m. for services or production purposes.
Therefore, those who intended to invest in any of the projects listed
above were entitled to request the amendment of the PUZ and to pay for
amendments. Any other potential investors who were interested in
developing different types of projects, other than the ones outlined
above, were banned from asking for the amendment of the PUZ, even if
they had the possibility to finance such change. Therefore, the
possibility for interested investors – either natural persons or legal
entities – to ask for the amendment of the existing PUZ and perform such
change, at their expense, was only an exception strictly limited by the
provisions of GEO 7, having as a target the creation of a coherent
urbanism system.
Law 190
significantly amended this main concept of GEO 7, thus allowing
individuals and legal entities to draw up and finance PUZs, at their
expense, except for specific cases where the urbanism documentation is
drafted at the exclusive initiative of public administration bodies.
According to the provisions of Law 190, public administration bodies are
expressly and exclusively allowed to initiate the drafting of the
following: (i) urbanism documentation; (ii) general urbanism plans (“PUG”);
(iii) PUZs for central areas; (iv) PUZs for areas protected in their
entirety; (v) PUZs for monument protection areas; and (vi) PUZs or
detail urbanism plans (“PUD”) for the accomplishment of public
interest objectives.
In all other cases
besides the foregoing, the initiative for the drafting of urbanism
documentation belongs both to public administration bodies, as well as
to any interested natural person or legal entity, which can ask for and
finance the amendment of the PUZ.
Where the
initiative for drafting the urbanism documentation belongs to public
administration bodies, the respective documentation shall be financed by
the state or local budget, except for the PUZs and PUDs amending parts
of the protected areas, which may also be financed by interested persons
or legal entities.
Possibility for
interested persons and/or legal entities to draw up and finance the
urbanism documentation
As noted above, Law
190 entirely changed the basis of GEO 7, now allowing interested persons
and/or legal entities to draw up PUZs and PUDs, irrespective of the
functionality of the construction, except for cases when the authority
is exclusively granted to the public administration bodies, as detailed
above.
Therefore, in cases
when the investor is asking, through a request for obtaining the
urbanism certificate, for an amendment of the already approved urbanism
documentation, or in cases where the specific characteristics of the
project require it, the public authority is entitled to authorize the
investment, conditioned only upon the approval of the amended PUZ. The
respective amendment to the existing and already approved PUZ must be
drawn up and financed by the respective investor.
Amendment of cases
where the drafting of a PUZ is mandatory
Law 190 eliminates
certain cases for which the Urbanism Law required the mandatory drafting
of PUZs, such as residential areas, hypermarkets, commercial parks,
production areas, cultural parks, sea coastal, or protection zone.
Law 190 is more
precise than GEO 7 and expressly states the projects for which the
drafting of a PUZ is mandatory, namely: central areas of localities;
protected areas and monument protection areas; entertainment and tourism
areas; industrial, technological and services areas / parks; division of
land into more than three plots; transport infrastructure; urban
restructuring or regeneration areas; and other areas established by
local public authorities, according to law.
Amendment of PUZs
for protected areas
According to the
newly adopted Law 190, even though, as a rule, the PUZs for areas
protected in their entirety may be amended only through plans drafted by
local public authorities, there is an exception allowing the amendment
of the respective PUZs only based on the documentation drawn up at the
initiative of interested persons or legal entities. The only
prerequisite is that the respective amendment must not change the
urbanism indicators more than 20% and must not amend the general nature
of the respective zone where the protected area is located.
Limitations
regarding the urbanism indicators
A PUZ regulates,
among other things, the construction rules, the functionality of the
area, the maximum allowed height of the construction, and the land use
coefficient (“CUT”). Again, even though Law 190 allows private
entities or natural persons to initiate the drafting and also finance a
PUZ amendment, it also imposes certain limits upon the possibilities to
amend the CUT. Therefore, in such cases, the newly proposed land use
coefficient cannot exceed the initially approved CUT by more than 20%,
and this can be proposed only once. This limitation shall not apply,
however, to the PUZs designated for areas having economic interest,
namely industrial or technological parks, hypermarkets, supermarkets,
commercial parks, service areas, and any other similar zone.
Clarifications with
regard to the regime of the PUD
Another significant
aspect introduced by Law 190 is the increase in the regulatory power of
the PUD. More specifically, the PUD is now allowed to amend the land
usage percentage (known in the Romanian legislation as the “POT”).
According to Romanian regulations, the CUT – land use coefficient – and
the POT – land usage percentage – are two essential urban parameters. By
allowing the amendment of the POT through the Detail Urbanism Plan, the
PUD has been severely criticized by urbanism and architect
organizations, arguing that the PUD only has the detail perspective –
the plot perspective – over the land, and not the entire neighborhood
perspective. This means that, if the construction of a project is
allowed by amending the POT, even if the respective project complies
with the existing land use coefficient established through the PUZ, then
the architectural characteristics of the respective building – such as
volume – may greatly differ from the image envisaged through the already
approved PUZ. Allowing the possibility for the land usage percentage to
be amended through the PUD may trigger the development of various
construction projects that, from an urbanism and architectural
perspective, do not comply with the parameters initially put in place by
the General Urbanism Plan and/or Zoning Urbanism Plan.
Changes with regard
to the content of the Urbanism Certificate
Law 190 introduced
another significant amendment in relation to the content of the Urbanism
Certificate. As mentioned above, obtaining the Urbanism Certificate is
the first step in the development of any construction project. According
to newly adopted Law 190, this document must now also indicate the rules
according to which the amendment or update of the existing urbanism
documentation and/or local regulations is possible.
Therefore, when the
new intended project does not comply with the technical parameters set
by the already approved urbanism documentation, the applicant must be
informed, through the Urbanism Certificate, of the following: (i) the
impossibility to amend the provisions of the already approved urbanism
documentation; (ii) the necessity to obtain an opportunity note (in
Romanian, aviz de oportunitate) according to the provisions of
the Urbanism Law; and (iii) the possibility to draft an amending
urbanism documentation, without the necessity of obtaining an
opportunity note, also in accordance with the provisions of the Urbanism
Law.
The investor will
therefore know, at the initial stage of its project, namely when
obtaining the Urbanism Certificate, whether it is possible or not to
amend the existing urbanism documentation and, if so, the manner in
which such amendment may be performed.
Extension of term
for approval / rejection of the territory planning urbanism and
documentation
The territory
planning and urbanism documentation is to be approved or rejected by the
appropriate local authority, namely the local or county council. The
local authority is obligated to issue its decision to either approve or
reject the respective documentation after (i) the finalization of the
public debate on the documentation; and after (ii) the local authority
has received a document from the mayor or the president of the county
council mentioning the grounds to either approve or reject the
documentation, as well as the special report drafted by the chief
architect.
Therefore, the
local or county council with the authority to approve or reject the
territory planning and urbanism documentation needs to consider, prior
to making its decision, not only all the grounds and conclusions of the
mayor or the president of the county council, but also of the chief
architect of the institution.
The term in which
the local authority must render its ruling has been extended by Law 190
from 30 days to 45 days – thus allowing more time for the local
authority to properly analyze the documentation.
Requirement to
obtain the approval of the Environment and Climate Change Ministry
The newly adopted
Law 190 also requires investors trying to develop projects with a focus
on tourism to obtain the approval of the Environment and Climate Change
Ministry. This approval is required for the following categories of
urbanism documentations: regional zoning plans, and PUZs regarding or
related to areas of tourism having national interest, such as mountain
or coastal zones. The main purpose in introducing this requirement is to
be able to ensure sustainable development and maintain the local
identity of those particular areas.
Other provisions
Status of
documentations elaborated according to prior legal provisions
Law 190 includes
certain transitory provisions according to which the approval of the
urbanism documentation drafted before February 1st, 2012, and
not yet approved on July 13th, 2013, must be performed
according to the provisions of the Urbanism Law, as amended through Law
190, in consideration of the documentation already drafted and the
notices / approvals already obtained as part of the process.
Methodological
norms
The Ministry for
Regional Development and Public Administration must draft the
methodological norms for the implementation of Law 190, as well as the
urbanism documentation, within a 90-day term from the effective date of
Law 190 (July 13, 2013). |